<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Testing on The Carpentries</title><link>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/tag/testing/</link><description>Recent content in Testing on The Carpentries</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:51:28 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/tag/testing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A New Lesson on Testing</title><link>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/2015/11/new-lesson-on-testing/</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/2015/11/new-lesson-on-testing/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;b>This post originally appeared on the &lt;a href="https://software-carpentry.org/">Software Carpentry website.&lt;/a>&lt;/b>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
 &lt;a href="{{site.baseurl}}/pages/team.html#huff.k">Katy Huff&lt;/a>
 has just posted a new lesson on
 &lt;a href="http://katyhuff.github.io/python-testing">testing and continuous integration with Python&lt;/a>
 drawn in part from
 &lt;a href="{{site.baseurl}}/pages/projects.html#eff-phys">the book&lt;/a>
 that she and &lt;a href="{{site.baseurl}}/pages/team.html#scopatz.a">Anthony Scopatz&lt;/a>
 recently published.
 There's a lot of useful material in here,
 all of it tested in the classroom&amp;mdash;please check it out.
&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Test-Driven Data Analysis</title><link>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/2015/11/test-driven-data-analysis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/2015/11/test-driven-data-analysis/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;b>This post originally appeared on the &lt;a href="https://software-carpentry.org/">Software Carpentry website.&lt;/a>&lt;/b>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
 My former colleague Nick Radcliffe has started posting a series of article
 on &lt;a href="http://www.tdda.info/">test-driven data analysis&lt;/a>,
 in which he explores systematic ways of checking whether
 one-off data analyses are correct.
 It'll be really interesting to see how the series unfolds,
 and comments on the posts would be very welcome.
&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Close Enough Redux</title><link>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/2015/04/close-enough-redux/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/2015/04/close-enough-redux/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;b>This post originally appeared on the &lt;a href="https://software-carpentry.org/">Software Carpentry website.&lt;/a>&lt;/b>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
 Back in October,
 we explained why &lt;a href="{{site.baseurl}}/blog/2014/10/why-we-dont-teach-testing.html">we don't teach testing&lt;/a>
 in Software Carpentry workshops.
 In response,
 Ian Hawke has put together
 &lt;a href="http://ianhawke.github.io/blog/close-enough.html">a really nice series of articles&lt;/a>
 about how he would test a small numerical program.
 It's great content,
 and it also shows yet again how &lt;a href="http://jupyter.org/">Jupyter&lt;/a>
 (formerly the IPython Notebook)
 is changing the way scientists create and share ideas.
&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Close Enough for Scientific Work</title><link>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/2014/11/close-enough-for-scientific-work/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://deploy-preview-705--carpentries-website.netlify.app/blog/2014/11/close-enough-for-scientific-work/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;b>This post originally appeared on the &lt;a href="https://software-carpentry.org/">Software Carpentry website.&lt;/a>&lt;/b>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
 The discussion around last month's post
 "&lt;a href="{{site.baseurl}}/blog/2014/10/why-we-dont-teach-testing.html">Why We Don't Teach Testing (Even Though We'd Like To)&lt;/a>"
 has been one of the most interesting in Software Carpentry's history.
 Inspired by that,
 and by discussion at &lt;a href="http://wssspe.researchcomputing.org.uk/WSSSPE2/">WSSSPE 2.0&lt;/a>,
 we are launching a collaborative book project called
 &lt;a href="{{site.github_url}}/close-enough-for-scientific-work">Close Enough for Scientific Work&lt;/a>
 in which scientists will show one another how they test their software.
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
 Contributions should be aimed at sophomores in science and engineering,
 and each should be sized to fit a one-hour lecture.
 While the format of each entry will vary according to its content,
 we expect most will follow this template:
&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>